| Details of Planning Application -
SB/05/00634 |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Full Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 17
/
06
/
2005 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 17
/
06
/
2005 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 17
/
06
/
2005 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | No date |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 12
/
08
/
2005 |
|---|
| Location: | LAND ADJACENT 64, NORTHVIEW ROAD, HOUGHTON REGIS, DUNSTABLE |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Houghton Regis |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | None submitted or required |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | ERECTION OF ONE DETACHED DWELLING AND DETACHED DOUBLE GARAGE (RENEWAL OF PLANNING PERMISSION SB/TP/00/0569) |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Jeremy Peter (Planning Consultant) |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0845 849 6300 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | planning@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Not available |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | 21
/
06
/
2005 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
1 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
1 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 21/08/2005 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | 12
/
09
/
2005 |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 13
/
09
/
2005 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Application - Granted |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)In accordance with Article 22 of the Town & Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995 (as Amended), the Council hereby certify that the proposal as hereby approved conforms with the relevant policies of the Development Plan (comprising of the Bedfordshire Structure Plan 2011 and the South Bedfordshire Local Plan Review) and material considerations do not indicate otherwise. The policies which refer are as follows:
Bedfordshire Structure Plan 2011
Policy 10 (Quality in Town and Country)
South Bedfordshire Local Plan Review
Policy BE8 (Design and Environmental Considerations)
Policy H2 (Fall-in Sites within Built-up Area)
Policy T4 (Public Transport Services along Former Luton/Dunstable Rail Line)In accordance with Article 22 of the Town & Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995 (as Amended), the Council hereby certify that the proposal as hereby approved conforms with the relevant policies of the Development Plan (comprising of the Bedfordshire Structure Plan 2011 and the South Bedfordshire Local Plan Review) and material considerations do not indicate otherwise. The policies which refer are as follows:
Bedfordshire Structure Plan 2011
Policy 10 (Quality in Town and Country)
South Bedfordshire Local Plan Review
Policy BE8 (Design and Environmental Considerations)
Policy H2 (Fall-in Sites within Built-up Area)
Policy T4 (Public Transport Services along Former Luton/Dunstable Rail Line) |
| 2
)In accordance with Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995 (as Amended), the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Bedfordshire Structure Plan 2011 (BSP) and the South Bedfordshire Local Plan Review (SBLPR).In accordance with Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995 (as Amended), the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Bedfordshire Structure Plan 2011 (BSP) and the South Bedfordshire Local Plan Review (SBLPR). |
| 3
)This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority. |
| 4
)Where remedial measures are necessary, they should be managed with Part 11A of the Environment Protection Act 1990 in mind. Encapsulation of any contaminants should be made on a risk-based assessment so that they are unlikely to be subject to future release to the environment.
All ground investigations shall be risk based and have regard to BS10175:2001 Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites - Code of Practice and Environment Agency/NHBC R&D Publication 66 - Guidance for the Safe Development of Housing on Land Affected by Contamination. Appropriate, authoritative and scientifically based guideline values shall be used.
The applicants/agent's consulting engineers shall certify that decontamination and remediation of the site has been undertaken in accordance with any measures approved by the District Planning Authority.
The applicant shall advise the District Planning Authority of commencement of the works.
The applicant should also be made aware that the ownership of land shown to be contaminated may accrue legal and financial liabilities under Part 11A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Such liabilities are maximised when "pollutant linkages" engender "pathways" for the contaminants to reach "receptors".
The applicant should adhere to CLR11: The Model Procedures for the Managements of Land Contamination, which has been developed to provide the technical framework for applying a risk management process when dealing with land affected by contamination.
South Bedfordshire District Council has published its Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy in line with the Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part 11A and its definition thereof. No land within the district has yet been formally designated as being 'contaminated'. However, it should not be taken to imply that the property or adjoining land is free from contamination.
I would ask that the Environment Agency be consulted on this application and any conditions proposed be applied separately and in their entirety.
Applicants should be advised to contact the Environmental Health Service for any further information.
Where planning permission is granted for a site and the presence of contaminants is known or is suspected, a separate notice should be issued to the applicant informing him that the responsibility for safe development and secure occupancy of the site, rests with the developer. The notice should also warn the applicant that the local planning authority has determined the application on the basis of the information available to it but this does not mean that the land is free from contamination.Where remedial measures are necessary, they should be managed with Part 11A of the Environment Protection Act 1990 in mind. Encapsulation of any contaminants should be made on a risk-based assessment so that they are unlikely to be subject to future release to the environment.
All ground investigations shall be risk based and have regard to BS10175:2001 Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites - Code of Practice and Environment Agency/NHBC R&D Publication 66 - Guidance for the Safe Development of Housing on Land Affected by Contamination. Appropriate, authoritative and scientifically based guideline values shall be used.
The applicants/agent's consulting engineers shall certify that decontamination and remediation of the site has been undertaken in accordance with any measures approved by the District Planning Authority.
The applicant shall advise the District Planning Authority of commencement of the works.
The applicant should also be made aware that the ownership of land shown to be contaminated may accrue legal and financial liabilities under Part 11A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Such liabilities are maximised when "pollutant linkages" engender "pathways" for the contaminants to reach "receptors".
The applicant should adhere to CLR11: The Model Procedures for the Managements of Land Contamination, which has been developed to provide the technical framework for applying a risk management process when dealing with land affected by contamination.
South Bedfordshire District Council has published its Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy in line with the Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part 11A and its definition thereof. No land within the district has yet been formally designated as being 'contaminated'. However, it should not be taken to imply that the property or adjoining land is free from contamination.
I would ask that the Environment Agency be consulted on this application and any conditions proposed be applied separately and in their entirety.
Applicants should be advised to contact the Environmental Health Service for any further information.
Where planning permission is granted for a site and the presence of contaminants is known or is suspected, a separate notice should be issued to the applicant informing him that the responsibility for safe development and secure occupancy of the site, rests with the developer. The notice should also warn the applicant that the local planning authority has determined the application on the basis of the information available to it but this does not mean that the land is free from contamination. |
| 5
)The applicant is advised to contact Keith Dove, the Transportation Strategy Manager at Luton Borough Council (01582 547211), with regard to the planned line of Translink within the vicinity of this site.The applicant is advised to contact Keith Dove, the Transportation Strategy Manager at Luton Borough Council (01582 547211), with regard to the planned line of Translink within the vicinity of this site. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|