| Details of Planning Application -
MB/02/02146/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Planning Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 16
/
12
/
2002 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 16
/
12
/
2002 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 16
/
12
/
2002 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 06
/
01
/
2003 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 10
/
02
/
2003 |
|---|
| Location: | Land At Glebe House, Southill Park, Southill |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Southill |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | Full: Variation of condition 13 (visibility splay) attached to planning permission ref: 45/2001/0847 dated 26.03.02 for the extension of pool house and stable block and relocation of access - revisions to visibility splay. |
|---|
| Case Officer: | James Clements |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 5302 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | planning@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Peter Inskip & Peter Jenkins Architects |
|---|
| 1 Newbury Street |
|---|
| London |
|---|
| EC1A 7HU |
|---|
| Press Date: | 27
/
12
/
2002 |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | No date |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
1 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 27/12/2002 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | No date |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 23
/
01
/
2003 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Conditional Approval |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)The applicant is advised to note that this permission does not imply or convey a variation of the remainder of the conditions attached to planning approval ref: 45/2001/0847.The applicant is advised to note that this permission does not imply or convey a variation of the remainder of the conditions attached to planning approval ref: 45/2001/0847. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|