| Details of Planning Application -
MB/03/00078/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Planning Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 14
/
01
/
2003 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 23
/
01
/
2003 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 23
/
01
/
2003 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 13
/
02
/
2003 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 20
/
03
/
2003 |
|---|
| Location: | 88 Stotfold Road, Arlesey, SG15 6XR |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Arlesey |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | None submitted or required |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | Full: Two and a half storey rear/side extension. |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Annabel Gammell |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 01234 228589 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | annabel.gammell@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | R J Oetgen |
|---|
| Summit House |
|---|
| Riparian Way |
|---|
| The Crossings |
|---|
| Cross Hills, Keighley |
|---|
| BD20 7BW |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | No date |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
1 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
1 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 29/01/2003 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | No date |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 19
/
02
/
2003 |
|---|
| Decision: | Refuse |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)The applicants attention is drawn to the descrepancy between the floor plans and the elevation drawings relating to the west elevation of the proposed extensionThe applicants attention is drawn to the descrepancy between the floor plans and the elevation drawings relating to the west elevation of the proposed extension |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|