| Details of Planning Application -
MB/04/00675/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Full Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 08
/
04
/
2004 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 08
/
04
/
2004 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 08
/
04
/
2004 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 29
/
04
/
2004 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 03
/
06
/
2004 |
|---|
| Location: | Land Rear Of 56, Hitchin Road, Arlesey, SG15 6RR |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Not available |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | None submitted or required |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | Full: Erection of one 2 bed bungalow and one 4 bed house and block of two garages |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Andrew Goodchild |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | planning@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | A Welland |
|---|
| 24A Market Square |
|---|
| Potton |
|---|
| Sandy |
|---|
| Beds |
|---|
| SG19 2NP |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | No date |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 20/04/2004 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | No date |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 25
/
05
/
2004 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Application - Refused |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)The applicant is advised that the only form of development which would be acceptable in this location would take the form of two small low rise single storey dwellings which would both be smaller than that proposed on plot 1 in this application, there maybe a possibility of including some rooms within the roofspace of a bungalow on plot 2. Given the constraints of the site the applicant is strongly advised to take account of the above and seek this Council's informal view on a revised proposal prior to the submission of a further application.The applicant is advised that the only form of development which would be acceptable in this location would take the form of two small low rise single storey dwellings which would both be smaller than that proposed on plot 1 in this application, there maybe a possibility of including some rooms within the roofspace of a bungalow on plot 2. Given the constraints of the site the applicant is strongly advised to take account of the above and seek this Council's informal view on a revised proposal prior to the submission of a further application. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|