1. Return to Search Page >>2. Search Results >>3. Planning Application Detail
Details of Planning Application - MB/05/00588/FULL

Click on the Consultation link below for neighbour and statutory consultee information and to comment on this application. Ensure your opinions are received before the consultation closing date.


Application Details View Documents (opens in new window) Consultation
Application registeredConsultation periodAwaiting decisionDecidedAppealAppeal decided
Application Type:Planning Application
Date Received:08 / 04 / 2005
Registration (Validation) Date:18 / 05 / 2005
Consultation Start Date:18 / 05 / 2005
Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires):08 / 06 / 2005
Target Date for Decision:13 / 07 / 2005
Location:23 Station Crescent, Lidlington, MK43 0SD
Parish Name:Lidlington
Conservation Area:Not available
Listed Building Grade:Not available
Environmental Assessment:Not available
Expected Decision Level:Officer Delegated
Description:Full: Two storey rear extension and front porch
Case Officer:Anne Strong
Status:Decided
Agent:Mr P Routledge
17 Steeple Drive
Alphington
Exeter
Devon
EX2 8FL
Press Date:No date
Site Notice Date:No date
NeighboursResponses Received: 0
and Representatives:In Favour: 0
Representation DetailsAgainst: 0
Comments: 0
Petitions Against: 0
Petitions For: 0
Officer Site Visit Date:31/05/2005
Committee Site Visit Date:No date
Committee Meeting Date:No date
Decision Level:Officer Delegated
Date Decision Made:No date
Date Decision Despatched:29 / 06 / 2005
Decision:Refuse
Conditions or Reasons:View Conditions or Reasons
Informative Notes:
1 )The applicant is advised that should a future application be made, a proposed two storey rear extension which is stepped in from the main buildings side elevation by one brick course would be viewed favourably. Plans should accurately portray the proposed elevations, to include alterations to existing windows (the side elevation omits window to bedroom 3).The applicant is advised that should a future application be made, a proposed two storey rear extension which is stepped in from the main buildings side elevation by one brick course would be viewed favourably. Plans should accurately portray the proposed elevations, to include alterations to existing windows (the side elevation omits window to bedroom 3).
Appeal Received Date:This case has no appeals against it
Planning Obligation Status:Not available

Return to Search PageTop of Page