1. Return to Search Page >>2. Search Results >>3. Planning Application Detail
Details of Planning Application - MB/05/00911/FULL

Click on the Consultation link below for neighbour and statutory consultee information and to comment on this application. Ensure your opinions are received before the consultation closing date.


Application Details View Documents (opens in new window) Consultation
Application registeredConsultation periodAwaiting decisionDecidedAppealAppeal decided
Application Type:Planning Application
Date Received:02 / 06 / 2005
Registration (Validation) Date:02 / 06 / 2005
Consultation Start Date:02 / 06 / 2005
Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires):23 / 06 / 2005
Target Date for Decision:28 / 07 / 2005
Location:49 Moor Lane, Maulden, MK45 2DJ
Parish Name:Maulden
Conservation Area:Not available
Listed Building Grade:Not available
Environmental Assessment:Not available
Expected Decision Level:Officer Delegated
Description:Full: Conversion of existing barn to form ancillary uses to adjacent domestic dwelling
Case Officer:Anne Strong
Status:Decided
Agent:Mr Stuart Palmer
Lincoln House
21 Dunstable Street
Ampthill
Bedford
MK45 2NJ
Press Date:No date
Site Notice Date:No date
NeighboursResponses Received: 1
and Representatives:In Favour: 0
Representation DetailsAgainst: 0
Comments: 0
Petitions Against: 0
Petitions For: 0
Officer Site Visit Date:06/07/2005
Committee Site Visit Date:No date
Committee Meeting Date:No date
Decision Level:Officer Delegated
Date Decision Made:No date
Date Decision Despatched:28 / 07 / 2005
Decision:Full Conditional Approval
Conditions or Reasons:View Conditions or Reasons
Informative Notes:
1 )The applicant is advised that any future application to separate the site into two separate residential curtilages and to use the barn subject of this application as a separate residential unit is unlikely to be supported by planning officers because the sub-division of the residential curtilage would be harmful to the character and appearance of the open countryside and contrary to established planning policies which seek to protect the countryside for its own sake.The applicant is advised that any future application to separate the site into two separate residential curtilages and to use the barn subject of this application as a separate residential unit is unlikely to be supported by planning officers because the sub-division of the residential curtilage would be harmful to the character and appearance of the open countryside and contrary to established planning policies which seek to protect the countryside for its own sake.
Appeal Received Date:This case has no appeals against it
Planning Obligation Status:Not available

Return to Search PageTop of Page