1. Return to Search Page >>2. Search Results >>3. Planning Application Detail
Details of Planning Application - MB/05/01553/FULL

Click on the Consultation link below for neighbour and statutory consultee information and to comment on this application. Ensure your opinions are received before the consultation closing date.


Application Details View Documents (opens in new window) Consultation
Application registeredConsultation periodAwaiting decisionDecidedAppealAppeal decided
Application Type:Planning Application
Date Received:19 / 09 / 2005
Registration (Validation) Date:27 / 09 / 2005
Consultation Start Date:27 / 09 / 2005
Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires):18 / 10 / 2005
Target Date for Decision:22 / 11 / 2005
Location:6 The Knoll, Maulden, MK45 2DB
Parish Name:Maulden
Conservation Area:Not available
Listed Building Grade:Not available
Environmental Assessment:Not available
Expected Decision Level:Officer Delegated
Description:Full: Retention of new access and brick wall to front. (retrospective)
Case Officer:Not available
Status:Appeal Decided
Agent:Mr P Braund
57 George Street
Maulden
Bedford
MK45 2DD
Press Date:07 / 10 / 2005
Site Notice Date:No date
NeighboursResponses Received: 2
and Representatives:In Favour: 0
Representation DetailsAgainst: 2
Comments: 0
Petitions Against: 0
Petitions For: 0
Officer Site Visit Date:09/11/2005
Committee Site Visit Date:No date
Committee Meeting Date:No date
Decision Level:Officer Delegated
Date Decision Made:No date
Date Decision Despatched:29 / 11 / 2005
Decision:Refuse
Conditions or Reasons:View Conditions or Reasons
Informative Notes:
1 )The applicant is advised that only front boundary treatment that would result in a softer impact and reflects its rural location within the Conservation Area would be considered acceptable. The failure to achieve a retrospective planning permission means the walls, as constructed, are unlawful. In order to avoid the need for legal action by Mid Beds District Council to correct this situation you are recommended to seek further advice on a more appropriate form of boundary treatment.The applicant is advised that only front boundary treatment that would result in a softer impact and reflects its rural location within the Conservation Area would be considered acceptable. The failure to achieve a retrospective planning permission means the walls, as constructed, are unlawful. In order to avoid the need for legal action by Mid Beds District Council to correct this situation you are recommended to seek further advice on a more appropriate form of boundary treatment.
2 )The applicant should note that planning permission is required for the main buildings new beams and that the works are therefore unlawful. The applicant is therefore strongly advised to submit an application for these works, or to remove them forthwith.The applicant should note that planning permission is required for the main buildings new beams and that the works are therefore unlawful. The applicant is therefore strongly advised to submit an application for these works, or to remove them forthwith.
Appeal Procedure:Written Representations
Hearing Date:No date
Appeal Received Date:15 / 05 / 2006
Appeal Decision:Planning Appeal Granted
Appeal Decision Date:12 / 10 / 2006
Planning Obligation Status:Not available

Return to Search PageTop of Page
A great place to live and work.

Useful information

Privacy