| Details of Planning Application -
MB/05/01631/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Full Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 29
/
09
/
2005 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 10
/
10
/
2005 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 10
/
10
/
2005 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 31
/
10
/
2005 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 05
/
12
/
2005 |
|---|
| Location: | 2 Tanqueray Avenue, Clophill, MK45 4AW |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Not available |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | Full: Single storey rear extension |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Mary Collins |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 4448 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | planning@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Mr R Bradshaw |
|---|
| 3 West End Road |
|---|
| Silsoe |
|---|
| Beds |
|---|
| MK45 4DU |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | 02
/
11
/
2005 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | No date |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 02
/
12
/
2005 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Application - Granted |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | A hipped roof over the two extensions to the rear would enhance the appearance of the rear of the property and would be more preferable than flat roofs. Planning Permission will be required for this and the Planning Department would look upon any future application favourably.A hipped roof over the two extensions to the rear would enhance the appearance of the rear of the property and would be more preferable than flat roofs. Planning Permission will be required for this and the Planning Department would look upon any future application favourably. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|