| Details of Planning Application -
MB/06/00037/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Planning Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 10
/
01
/
2006 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 23
/
01
/
2006 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 23
/
01
/
2006 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 13
/
02
/
2006 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 20
/
03
/
2006 |
|---|
| Location: | 43 Elmwood Crescent, Flitwick, MK45 1LH |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Flitwick |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | Full: Extensions and alterations to house to form 2 no. 3 bed dwellings |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Jon Durbin MRTPI |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 08452 30 40 40 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | info@jondurbin.co.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Not available |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | No date |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | No date |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 13
/
03
/
2006 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Conditional Approval |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)It is apparent that there is an inconsistency betwee drawing nos. 009B and 01B, which both show the design of the side extensions to have hipped roofs and drawing nos. 011B and 012B which both show the design of the side extensions to have gable ended roofs. Notwithstanding the details shown on drawing nos. 011B and 12B, this planning permission is granted on the basis that the side extensions are built in accordance with details shown on drawing nos. 009B and 010B.It is apparent that there is an inconsistency betwee drawing nos. 009B and 01B, which both show the design of the side extensions to have hipped roofs and drawing nos. 011B and 012B which both show the design of the side extensions to have gable ended roofs. Notwithstanding the details shown on drawing nos. 011B and 12B, this planning permission is granted on the basis that the side extensions are built in accordance with details shown on drawing nos. 009B and 010B. |
| 2
)You are also reminded that no part of the extensions including eaves or gutters should encroach beyond the boundary of the application site.You are also reminded that no part of the extensions including eaves or gutters should encroach beyond the boundary of the application site. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|