| Details of Planning Application -
MB/07/00863/LDCP |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Lawful Development Cert - Proposed |
|---|
| Date Received: | 18
/
05
/
2007 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 29
/
05
/
2007 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 29
/
05
/
2007 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 19
/
06
/
2007 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 24
/
07
/
2007 |
|---|
| Location: | 26 London Row, Arlesey, SG15 6RX |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Not available |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | Certificate of Lawful Development (Proposed): Single storey rear extension |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Samantha Boyd |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 4446 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | sam.boyd@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | M J Holmes |
|---|
| 13 Aviary Walk |
|---|
| Brickhill |
|---|
| Bedford |
|---|
| MK41 7JD |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | No date |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | No date |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 12
/
07
/
2007 |
|---|
| Decision: | Lawful Dev - Proposed - Refused |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)The proposed extension is outside of the curtilage of the application site. The extension overlaps the boundary shared with the neighbouring dwelling. This is not in accordance with the criteria listed within the Town and Country (General Permitted Development) Order 1995.The proposed extension is outside of the curtilage of the application site. The extension overlaps the boundary shared with the neighbouring dwelling. This is not in accordance with the criteria listed within the Town and Country (General Permitted Development) Order 1995. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|