| Details of Planning Application -
MB/07/01908/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Planning Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 12
/
11
/
2007 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 29
/
11
/
2007 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 29
/
11
/
2007 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 20
/
12
/
2007 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 24
/
01
/
2008 |
|---|
| Location: | 1 Bunyans Walk, Harlington, Dunstable, LU5 6NN |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Harlington |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | FULL: Single Storey and Lower Ground Side Extension to Existing Bungalow |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Pru Khimasia |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 08452 30 40 40 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | pru.khimasia@midbeds.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Mr DV James |
|---|
| 38 Fairfield Way |
|---|
| Brooches Mead |
|---|
| Stevenage |
|---|
| Herts |
|---|
| SG1 6BG |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | 14
/
12
/
2007 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | No date |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 28
/
01
/
2008 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Conditional Approval |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)The applicant is recommended that the existing tiles on the hipped face of the main roof be used on the alteration to the existing roof, in order to minimise any mismatch of materials.The applicant is recommended that the existing tiles on the hipped face of the main roof be used on the alteration to the existing roof, in order to minimise any mismatch of materials. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|