| Details of Planning Application -
MB/08/01992/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Full Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 22
/
10
/
2008 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 23
/
10
/
2008 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 23
/
10
/
2008 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 13
/
11
/
2008 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 18
/
12
/
2008 |
|---|
| Location: | Holly Lodge, Dene Close, Aspley Guise, Milton Keynes, MK17 8NL |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Not available |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | Full: Alterations and extension and remodelling of existing dwelling. |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Mary Collins |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 4448 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | planning@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Mr Beasley |
|---|
| 25 Walker Avenue |
|---|
| Stratford Office Village |
|---|
| Wolverton Mill East |
|---|
| Milton Keynes, Bucks |
|---|
| MK12 5TW |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | 17
/
11
/
2008 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | No date |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 18
/
12
/
2008 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Application - Granted |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | Any subsequent planning application for the erection of a garage to the front of the property is unlikely to be viewed favourably.Any subsequent planning application for the erection of a garage to the front of the property is unlikely to be viewed favourably. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|