| Details of Planning Application -
CB/10/00768/LDCP |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Lawful Development Cert - Proposed |
|---|
| Date Received: | 02
/
03
/
2010 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 02
/
03
/
2010 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 02
/
03
/
2010 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 30
/
03
/
2010 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 27
/
04
/
2010 |
|---|
| Location: | 35 Coppice Mead, Stotfold, SG5 4JY |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Stotfold |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Not available |
|---|
| Description: | Lawful Development Certificate Proposed: Loft conversion with rear box dormer, front rooflights and side window. |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Judy Self |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 4375 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | planning@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Withdrawn |
|---|
| Agent: | Mr C Speakman |
|---|
| 7 Convent Close |
|---|
| Hitchin |
|---|
| Herts |
|---|
| SG5 1QN |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | No date |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 19/04/2010 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | 20
/
04
/
2010 |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 20
/
04
/
2010 |
|---|
| Decision: | Application Withdrawn |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)With regards to the dormer window, development is permitted by Class B of Schedule 2 Part 1 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment) (No.2) (England) Order 2008 subject to the following conditions-
(a) the materials used in any exterior work shall be of a similar appearance to those used in the construction of the exterior of the existing dwellinghouse;
(b) other than in the case of a hip-to-gable enlargement, the edge of the enlargement closest to the eaves of the original roof shall, so far as practicable, be not less than 20 centimetres from the eaves of the original roof.
(c) any window inserted on a wall or roof slope forming a side elevation of the dwellinghouse shall be
(i) obscure-glazed, and
(ii) non-opening unless the parts of the window which can be opened are more than 1.7 metres above the floor of the room in which the window is installed.With regards to the dormer window, development is permitted by Class B of Schedule 2 Part 1 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment) (No.2) (England) Order 2008 subject to the following conditions-
(a) the materials used in any exterior work shall be of a similar appearance to those used in the construction of the exterior of the existing dwellinghouse;
(b) other than in the case of a hip-to-gable enlargement, the edge of the enlargement closest to the eaves of the original roof shall, so far as practicable, be not less than 20 centimetres from the eaves of the original roof.
(c) any window inserted on a wall or roof slope forming a side elevation of the dwellinghouse shall be
(i) obscure-glazed, and
(ii) non-opening unless the parts of the window which can be opened are more than 1.7 metres above the floor of the room in which the window is installed. |
| 2
)This Certificate of Lawful Development is issued on the basis of the plans submitted and any variation from the plans would not be covered by this certificate.This Certificate of Lawful Development is issued on the basis of the plans submitted and any variation from the plans would not be covered by this certificate. |
| 4
)This certificate is issued solely for the purpose of section 192 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended)
It certifies that the operations specified in the First Schedule taking place on the land described in the Second Schedule would have been lawful, on the specified date and thus would not have been liable to enforcement action under Section 172 of the 1990 Act on that date.
This certificate applies only to the extent of the operations described in the First Schedule and to the land specified in the Second Schedule and identified on the attached plan. Any operation which is materially different from that described or which relates to other land may render the owner or occupier liable to enforcement action.
The effect of this certificate is also qualified by the proviso in section 192(4) of the 1990 Act, as amended, which states that the lawfulness of a described use or operation is only conclusively presumed where there has been no material change, before the use is instituted or the operations begun, in any of the matters relevant to determining such lawfulness.This certificate is issued solely for the purpose of section 192 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended)
It certifies that the operations specified in the First Schedule taking place on the land described in the Second Schedule would have been lawful, on the specified date and thus would not have been liable to enforcement action under Section 172 of the 1990 Act on that date.
This certificate applies only to the extent of the operations described in the First Schedule and to the land specified in the Second Schedule and identified on the attached plan. Any operation which is materially different from that described or which relates to other land may render the owner or occupier liable to enforcement action.
The effect of this certificate is also qualified by the proviso in section 192(4) of the 1990 Act, as amended, which states that the lawfulness of a described use or operation is only conclusively presumed where there has been no material change, before the use is instituted or the operations begun, in any of the matters relevant to determining such lawfulness. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|