| Details of Planning Application -
CB/13/02114/GPDE |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | GPD - Larger Extensions |
|---|
| Date Received: | 19
/
06
/
2013 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 19
/
06
/
2013 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 19
/
06
/
2013 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 10
/
07
/
2013 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 31
/
07
/
2013 |
|---|
| Location: | 2 Melfort Drive, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2XN |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Leighton-Linslade |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Not available |
|---|
| Description: | Prior Notification Householder: Single storey rear extension 4 metres beyond the rear of the original wall, 3.9m high, 2.4m to the eaves |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Debbie Willcox |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300-300-5723 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | planning@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Mr D J Harnett |
|---|
| 11 Dukes Ride |
|---|
| Leighton Buzzard |
|---|
| Beds |
|---|
| LU7 3JS |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | No date |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 20/06/2013 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | 12
/
07
/
2013 |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 15
/
07
/
2013 |
|---|
| Decision: | GPD - Not required |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | There are no conditions |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)In reference to the above informative, the submitted illustrative drawings depict a proposed extension that would not meet all the requirements of Part 1, Class A and therefore would not constitute permitted development. This is because the maximum height of the extension shown on the illustrative drawing is shown as being greater than 4 metres, which is one of the limitations set out in Part 1 Class A. It should be noted that the maximum height should be measured from the natural ground level immediately adjacent to the building.In reference to the above informative, the submitted illustrative drawings depict a proposed extension that would not meet all the requirements of Part 1, Class A and therefore would not constitute permitted development. This is because the maximum height of the extension shown on the illustrative drawing is shown as being greater than 4 metres, which is one of the limitations set out in Part 1 Class A. It should be noted that the maximum height should be measured from the natural ground level immediately adjacent to the building. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|