| Details of Planning Application -
CB/14/00640/LDCE |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Lawful Development Cert - Existing |
|---|
| Date Received: | 20
/
02
/
2014 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 20
/
02
/
2014 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 20
/
02
/
2014 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 25
/
03
/
2014 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 17
/
04
/
2014 |
|---|
| Location: | Land at 95 High Street, Henlow, SG16 6AB |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Henlow |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Not available |
|---|
| Description: | Lawful Development Certificate for existing use of land as residential garden for purposes incidental to the residential occupation of the dwellinghouse. |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Amy Lack |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 5893 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | amy.lack@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Mr Wilden |
|---|
| 1 Hill Rise |
|---|
| Twyford |
|---|
| Winchester |
|---|
| Hampshire |
|---|
| SO21 1QH |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | 27
/
02
/
2014 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 06/02/2014 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | 16
/
04
/
2014 |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 17
/
04
/
2014 |
|---|
| Decision: | Lawful Dev - Existing - Granted |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | There are no conditions |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)The applicant is advised that the question of lawful use, as distinct from permitted development rights, is an entirely separate issue which is of no relevance in relation to the lawful use of any part of the property. The Local Planning Authority do not consider this land to be considered 'curtilage' land to No.95 High Street with the benefit of permitted development rights. Accordingly, the development works on this parcel of land are unlawful for the permitted development rights granted by Class E of Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 as amended which do not extend to the subject land.The applicant is advised that the question of lawful use, as distinct from permitted development rights, is an entirely separate issue which is of no relevance in relation to the lawful use of any part of the property. The Local Planning Authority do not consider this land to be considered 'curtilage' land to No.95 High Street with the benefit of permitted development rights. Accordingly, the development works on this parcel of land are unlawful for the permitted development rights granted by Class E of Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 as amended which do not extend to the subject land. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|