| Details of Planning Application -
CB/16/04750/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Full Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 13
/
10
/
2016 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 01
/
11
/
2016 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 01
/
11
/
2016 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 02
/
12
/
2016 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 23
/
12
/
2016 |
|---|
| Location: | Site formerly know as G B S Coaches, Barford Road, Blunham, Bedford, MK44 3NA |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Blunham |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Not available |
|---|
| Description: | Erection of replacement B2/B8 building following fire damage and other associated works |
|---|
| Case Officer: | DO NOT USE - Mark Spragg |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 6365 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | mark.spragg@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Mrs H Doyle |
|---|
| 3 Stevenson Court |
|---|
| Eaton Ford |
|---|
| St. Neots |
|---|
| PE19 7LF |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | No date |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | 23
/
12
/
2016 |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 23
/
12
/
2016 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Application - Granted |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the Core Strategy for North Central Bedfordshire.In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the Core Strategy for North Central Bedfordshire. |
| 2
)This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority. |
| 3
)Discharge of roof water should be to a soakaway if ground conditions permit. The soakaway should not accept pollutants from the bus parking area.Discharge of roof water should be to a soakaway if ground conditions permit. The soakaway should not accept pollutants from the bus parking area. |
| 4
)Best practice would be to park the buses on a solid standing to prevent pollutants directly falling on the ground. The bus parking areas would benefit from permeable paving, this would prevent the direct discharge of polluted water to land. If this is too costly a filter strip and filter drain system could be used to prevent pollutants uncontrolled discharge onto open land. In the event of a spill a well designed but simple drainage system will prevent costly rejuvenation of the area.Best practice would be to park the buses on a solid standing to prevent pollutants directly falling on the ground. The bus parking areas would benefit from permeable paving, this would prevent the direct discharge of polluted water to land. If this is too costly a filter strip and filter drain system could be used to prevent pollutants uncontrolled discharge onto open land. In the event of a spill a well designed but simple drainage system will prevent costly rejuvenation of the area. |
| 5
)Where the use of permeable surfacing is proposed, this should be designed in accordance with the 'CIRIA RP992 The SuDS Manual Update: Paper RP992/28: Design Assessment Checklists for Permeable/Porous Pavement'.Where the use of permeable surfacing is proposed, this should be designed in accordance with the 'CIRIA RP992 The SuDS Manual Update: Paper RP992/28: Design Assessment Checklists for Permeable/Porous Pavement'. |
| 6
)To ensure future and subsequent owners will be aware of any maintenance requirements / responsibilities for surface water drainage, further measures should be proposed by the applicant and may include, for example, information provided to the first purchaser of the property and also designation/registration of the SuDS so that it appears as a Land Charge for the property and as such is identified to subsequent purchasers of the property. Any methods involving designation or registering a Land Charge are to be agreed with the LPA.To ensure future and subsequent owners will be aware of any maintenance requirements / responsibilities for surface water drainage, further measures should be proposed by the applicant and may include, for example, information provided to the first purchaser of the property and also designation/registration of the SuDS so that it appears as a Land Charge for the property and as such is identified to subsequent purchasers of the property. Any methods involving designation or registering a Land Charge are to be agreed with the LPA. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|