| Details of Planning Application -
CB/16/05275/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Full Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 15
/
11
/
2016 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 15
/
11
/
2016 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 15
/
11
/
2016 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 24
/
02
/
2017 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 10
/
01
/
2017 |
|---|
| Location: | Trinity Hall Farm, Watling Street, Hockliffe, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 9PY |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Chalgrave |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Description: | Conversion of existing traditional farm buildings to 5no residential dwellings including removal of various existing structures, provision of parking and access |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Peter Vosper |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 4157 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | peter.vosper@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Mr A Munro |
|---|
| 118 Bromham Road |
|---|
| Bedford |
|---|
| Beds |
|---|
| MK40 2QN |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | 12
/
12
/
2016 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
0 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 12/12/2016 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | 02
/
11
/
2017 |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 03
/
11
/
2017 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Application - Granted |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the South Bedfordshire Local Plan Review (SBLPR) and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the South Bedfordshire Local Plan Review (SBLPR) and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). |
| 2
)This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority. |
| 3
)Central Bedfordshire Council as highway authority will not consider the proposed on-site vehicular areas for adoption as highway maintainable at public expense.Central Bedfordshire Council as highway authority will not consider the proposed on-site vehicular areas for adoption as highway maintainable at public expense. |
| 4
)All works within the highway boundary shall be carried out under a Section 278 Agreement with Highways England.All works within the highway boundary shall be carried out under a Section 278 Agreement with Highways England. |
| 5
)The three visitor parking bays shown on plan A/43154/17 should be 6m in length, not 5m.The three visitor parking bays shown on plan A/43154/17 should be 6m in length, not 5m. |
| 6
)The narrow margins along the western gable ends of units 1, 3 and 5, shown on superseded plan A/43157/14, which helped to provide driver/driver intervisibility splays, should be reinstated.The narrow margins along the western gable ends of units 1, 3 and 5, shown on superseded plan A/43157/14, which helped to provide driver/driver intervisibility splays, should be reinstated. |
| 7
)The site is located above a Principal Aquifer. However, the Environment Agency do not consider this proposal to be High Risk. Therefore, the Environment Agency will not be providing detailed site-specific advice or comments with regards to land contamination issues for this site. The developer should address risks to controlled waters from contamination at the site, following the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework and the Environment Agency Guiding Principles for Land Contamination, which can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/managing-and-reducing-land-contaminationThe site is located above a Principal Aquifer. However, the Environment Agency do not consider this proposal to be High Risk. Therefore, the Environment Agency will not be providing detailed site-specific advice or comments with regards to land contamination issues for this site. The developer should address risks to controlled waters from contamination at the site, following the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework and the Environment Agency Guiding Principles for Land Contamination, which can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/managing-and-reducing-land-contamination |
| 8
)The water environment is potentially vulnerable and there is an increased potential for pollution from inappropriately located and/or designed infiltration (SuDS). The Environment Agency consider any infiltration (SuDS) greater than 2.0 m below ground level to be a deep system and os generally not acceptable. All infiltration SuDS require a minimum of 1.2 m clearance between the base of infiltration SuDS and peak seasonal groundwater levels. All need to meet the criteria in the Environment Agency's Groundwater Protection: Principles and Practice (GP3) position statements G1 to G13 which can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/297347/LIT_7660_9a3742.pdfThe water environment is potentially vulnerable and there is an increased potential for pollution from inappropriately located and/or designed infiltration (SuDS). The Environment Agency consider any infiltration (SuDS) greater than 2.0 m below ground level to be a deep system and os generally not acceptable. All infiltration SuDS require a minimum of 1.2 m clearance between the base of infiltration SuDS and peak seasonal groundwater levels. All need to meet the criteria in the Environment Agency's Groundwater Protection: Principles and Practice (GP3) position statements G1 to G13 which can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/297347/LIT_7660_9a3742.pdf |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|