| Details of Planning Application -
CB/17/00433/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Full Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 26
/
01
/
2017 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 28
/
02
/
2017 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 28
/
02
/
2017 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 28
/
03
/
2017 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 25
/
04
/
2017 |
|---|
| Location: | 10 Sycamore Close, Flitwick, Bedford, MK45 1LT |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Flitwick |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Not available |
|---|
| Description: | Proposed erection of double garage adjoining existing property |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Stuart Kemp |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 5370 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | stuart.kemp@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Not available |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | 03
/
03
/
2017 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
1 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
0 |
|---|
| Comments:
1 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 03/03/2017 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | 25
/
04
/
2017 |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 26
/
04
/
2017 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Application - Refused |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)The information provided with this application is invalid, works are proposed to the public highway but no formal notice has been served on the Highway Authority and as such the incorrect ownership certificate has been signed and submitted with this application. Should any further application be submitted which includes works to the public highway ownership certificate B should be signed and formal notice should be served on the Highway Authority.The information provided with this application is invalid, works are proposed to the public highway but no formal notice has been served on the Highway Authority and as such the incorrect ownership certificate has been signed and submitted with this application. Should any further application be submitted which includes works to the public highway ownership certificate B should be signed and formal notice should be served on the Highway Authority. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|