| Details of Planning Application -
CB/18/02427/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Full Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 25
/
06
/
2018 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 25
/
06
/
2018 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 25
/
06
/
2018 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 07
/
08
/
2018 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 20
/
08
/
2018 |
|---|
| Location: | Corbetts Hill Farm, Taylors Ride, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 3JN |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Leighton-Linslade |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Not available |
|---|
| Description: | Redevelopment of farm buildings and pool house to create six dwellings with associated works |
|---|
| Case Officer: | Judy Martin |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 4375 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | judy.martin@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Mrs J Harris |
|---|
| 5 Warren Yard |
|---|
| Warren Park |
|---|
| Old Wolverton |
|---|
| Milton Keynes |
|---|
| MK12 5NW |
|---|
| Press Date: | 17
/
07
/
2018 |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | 13
/
07
/
2018 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
15 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
1 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
13 |
|---|
| Comments:
1 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 13/07/2018 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | 27
/
06
/
2019 |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 27
/
06
/
2019 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Application - Refused |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)This decision refers to plan numbers 17-25-P-101; 17-25-P-102; 17-25-P-103; 17-25-P-104; 17-25-P-105; 17-25-P-106; 17-25-P-107; 17-25-P-108; 17-25-P-109; 17-25-P-110; 17-25-P-111; 17-25-P-112; 17-25-P-121A; 17-25-P-122; 17-25-P-123; 17-25-P-124; 17-25-P-126A; 17-25-P-127B; 17-25-P-128B; 17-25-P-131; 17-25-P-132; 17-25-P-133; 17-25-P-145; 17-25-P-147; 17-25-P-155This decision refers to plan numbers 17-25-P-101; 17-25-P-102; 17-25-P-103; 17-25-P-104; 17-25-P-105; 17-25-P-106; 17-25-P-107; 17-25-P-108; 17-25-P-109; 17-25-P-110; 17-25-P-111; 17-25-P-112; 17-25-P-121A; 17-25-P-122; 17-25-P-123; 17-25-P-124; 17-25-P-126A; 17-25-P-127B; 17-25-P-128B; 17-25-P-131; 17-25-P-132; 17-25-P-133; 17-25-P-145; 17-25-P-147; 17-25-P-155 |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|