| Details of Planning Application -
CB/22/04842/FULL |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application Type: | Full Application |
|---|
| Date Received: | 15
/
12
/
2022 |
|---|
| Registration (Validation) Date: | 16
/
12
/
2022 |
|---|
| Consultation Start Date: | 16
/
12
/
2022 |
|---|
| Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires): | 01
/
02
/
2023 |
|---|
| Target Date for Decision: | 10
/
02
/
2023 |
|---|
| Location: | Station House, Church Street, Lidlington, Bedford, MK43 0RJ |
|---|
| Parish Name: | Lidlington |
|---|
| Conservation Area: | Not available |
|---|
| Listed Building Grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental Assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Expected Decision Level: | Not available |
|---|
| Description: | Change of Use: for use of outbuildings as dog kennels and new build kennel to rear of site (Retrospective) |
|---|
| Case Officer: | William Comber |
|---|
| Case Officer Tel: | 0300 300 6246 |
|---|
| Case Officer Email: | william.comber@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Mr H Dibden |
|---|
| Unit 2 |
|---|
| Warren Court |
|---|
| Chicksands |
|---|
| Shefford, Bedfordshire |
|---|
| SG175QB |
|---|
| Press Date: | No date |
|---|
| Site Notice Date: | 11
/
01
/
2023 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses Received:
9 |
|---|
| and Representatives: | In Favour:
0 |
|---|
| Representation Details | Against:
9 |
|---|
| Comments:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions Against:
0 |
|---|
| Petitions For:
0 |
|---|
| Officer Site Visit Date: | 11/01/2023 |
|---|
| Committee Site Visit Date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee Meeting Date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Officer Delegated |
|---|
| Date Decision Made: | 04
/
04
/
2023 |
|---|
| Date Decision Despatched: | 04
/
04
/
2023 |
|---|
| Decision: | Full Application - Refused |
|---|
| Conditions or Reasons: | View Conditions or Reasons |
|---|
| Informative Notes: | | 1
)This decision refers to plan numbers OAK-272.This decision refers to plan numbers OAK-272. |
| 2
)Network Rail have objected to the application due to land included within the red outline falling within their ownership. No details were submitted by the applicant to clarify the matter given that the application form stated that all land was within the applicant's ownership and no notice was served on any persons. If it turns out that all the land within the red outline is not within the applicants soles ownership, this would invalidate the application given the wrong ownership certificate has been signed and no notice has been served on any other land owners.Network Rail have objected to the application due to land included within the red outline falling within their ownership. No details were submitted by the applicant to clarify the matter given that the application form stated that all land was within the applicant's ownership and no notice was served on any persons. If it turns out that all the land within the red outline is not within the applicants soles ownership, this would invalidate the application given the wrong ownership certificate has been signed and no notice has been served on any other land owners. |
|
|---|
| Appeal Received Date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
| Planning Obligation Status: | Not available |
|---|