1. Return to Search Page >>2. Search Results >>3. Planning Application Detail
Details of Planning Application - CB/23/03605/FULL

Click on the Consultation link below for neighbour and statutory consultee information and to comment on this application. Ensure your opinions are received before the consultation closing date.


Application Details View Documents (opens in new window) Consultation
Application registeredConsultation periodAwaiting decisionDecidedAppealAppeal decided
Application Type:Full Application
Date Received:07 / 11 / 2023
Registration (Validation) Date:08 / 11 / 2023
Consultation Start Date:08 / 11 / 2023
Earliest Decision Date (Consultation Period Expires):08 / 12 / 2023
Target Date for Decision:03 / 01 / 2024
Location:20 Markyate Road, Slip End, Luton, LU1 4BX
Parish Name:Slip End
Conservation Area:Not available
Listed Building Grade:Not available
Environmental Assessment:Not available
Expected Decision Level:Not available
Description:Demolition of existing garage, construction of a single storey side extension, part single and two storey rear extension and three side flat roof dormer windows, and internal alterations. External material change to front elevation from boarding to render.
Case Officer:Sophie Wharton
Case Officer Tel:0300 300 4453
Case Officer Email:sophie.wharton@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk
Status:Decided
Agent:Mr Richard Collin
27 St Andrews Close
Slip End
Luton
LU1 4DE
Press Date:No date
Site Notice Date:17 / 11 / 2023
NeighboursResponses Received: 0
and Representatives:In Favour: 0
Representation DetailsAgainst: 0
Comments: 0
Petitions Against: 0
Petitions For: 0
Officer Site Visit Date:17/11/2023
Committee Site Visit Date:No date
Committee Meeting Date:No date
Decision Level:Officer Delegated
Date Decision Made:12 / 01 / 2024
Date Decision Despatched:12 / 01 / 2024
Decision:Full Application - Granted
Conditions or Reasons:View Conditions or Reasons
Informative Notes:
1 )Reasons for granting The application site comprises of a detached chalet bungalow in Slip End, Luton. 20 Markyate Road is constructed of a mix of brickwork with white cladding and is surrounded by properties of a similar style, scale and design. The application seeks planning permission for the erection of a single storey side extension following the removal of the existing garage, part single and two storey rear extension, three flat roof side dormer windows and internal alterations. Permission is also sought to change the existing exterior boarding to render. The proposed single storey side extension would protrude forward of the northeastern side elevation of the dwellinghouse and would be visible to the streetscene. The proposal is of a modest, single storey design which is proportionate to the existing dwelling and harmonises with its existing built form. The proposal would be constructed of brickwork to match the existing dwelling and as such, is not considered to cause harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposed part single and two storey extension would be sited to the rear of the dwellinghouse. The part single storey aspect would provide an extension to the existing built form of the single storey rear extension, and the proposed two storey aspect would extend the existing roof space. By virtue of its siting and location, it is not considered that the proposal would be readily visible to the streetscene. As such, it is not considered that the proposal would have a material impact on the character and appearance of the area. The proposed extension would remain proportionate to the existing dwelling and would play a supporting role as a subservient addition. The part single storey aspect would be constructed of brickwork to match the existing dwelling whilst the two storey aspect would be rendered. Similarly, the front gable end and the proposed side dormer windows would be finished in render. Whilst this would not match the existing dwelling, render is used elsewhere within the streetscene, as evidenced by No.28, No.30, No.32 and No.34. Therefore, it is not considered that the proposed external finish would have an unacceptable impact on the character and appearance of the area. The proposal would insert three side dormer windows into the roofslope of the dwellinghouse; two on the southwestern side roofslope and one on the northeastern side roofslope. Whilst the proposed dormer windows would be considered a boxy addition to the dwellinghouse, it is acknowledged that the dormers would be located towards the centre and rear of the roofslope and would not appear obtrusive within the streetscene. One of the three side dormers would serve a bathroom and would face onto No.24 Markyate Road. In the interests of the residential amenity of current and future occupiers, a condition has been appended to this decision to ensure that this window is fitted with obscured glazing. One of the three side dormers would serve a bedroom and would face onto No.24 Markyate Road. This neighbouring property is single storey and does not benefit from any first-floor windows. Therefore, it is not considered that the proposal would give rise to any harmful, mutual overlooking concerns. The proposed window is high level and therefore, it is considered that any potential views from this window would be limited and would not result in an unacceptable loss of privacy. One of the three side dormers would serve a bedroom and would face onto No.18 Markyate Road. No.18 is a two-storey detached property. This neighbour does benefit from a first floor window in the adjacent side elevation, however it is obscurely glazed. Moreover, the proposed dormer would be sited towards the rear of the northeastern side roofslope and would not be opposite window. Therefore, it is not considered that the proposal would give rise to any mutual overlooking concerns. The proposed window is high level and therefore, it is considered that any potential views from this window would be limited and would not result in an unacceptable loss of privacy. The proposed developments, due to their scale, design and siting (in terms of proximity to boundary and/or relationship with neighbouring properties), would not result in an unacceptable loss of light or overbearing impact to these neighbouring properties. The application site will maintain three bedrooms with one room labelled as a bedroom/playroom. The Parking Standards for New Developments Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) requires a 4 bedroom dwelling to have 3 parking spaces. This has been demonstrated on plan number 02_PL RevB. Slip End Parish Council and Natural England were consulted on this application but did not provide any comments. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. In conclusion, it is considered that the proposal will be in accordance with Section 12 of the NPPF, Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, the Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and the Central Bedfordshire Design Guide.Reasons for granting The application site comprises of a detached chalet bungalow in Slip End, Luton. 20 Markyate Road is constructed of a mix of brickwork with white cladding and is surrounded by properties of a similar style, scale and design. The application seeks planning permission for the erection of a single storey side extension following the removal of the existing garage, part single and two storey rear extension, three flat roof side dormer windows and internal alterations. Permission is also sought to change the existing exterior boarding to render. The proposed single storey side extension would protrude forward of the northeastern side elevation of the dwellinghouse and would be visible to the streetscene. The proposal is of a modest, single storey design which is proportionate to the existing dwelling and harmonises with its existing built form. The proposal would be constructed of brickwork to match the existing dwelling and as such, is not considered to cause harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposed part single and two storey extension would be sited to the rear of the dwellinghouse. The part single storey aspect would provide an extension to the existing built form of the single storey rear extension, and the proposed two storey aspect would extend the existing roof space. By virtue of its siting and location, it is not considered that the proposal would be readily visible to the streetscene. As such, it is not considered that the proposal would have a material impact on the character and appearance of the area. The proposed extension would remain proportionate to the existing dwelling and would play a supporting role as a subservient addition. The part single storey aspect would be constructed of brickwork to match the existing dwelling whilst the two storey aspect would be rendered. Similarly, the front gable end and the proposed side dormer windows would be finished in render. Whilst this would not match the existing dwelling, render is used elsewhere within the streetscene, as evidenced by No.28, No.30, No.32 and No.34. Therefore, it is not considered that the proposed external finish would have an unacceptable impact on the character and appearance of the area. The proposal would insert three side dormer windows into the roofslope of the dwellinghouse; two on the southwestern side roofslope and one on the northeastern side roofslope. Whilst the proposed dormer windows would be considered a boxy addition to the dwellinghouse, it is acknowledged that the dormers would be located towards the centre and rear of the roofslope and would not appear obtrusive within the streetscene. One of the three side dormers would serve a bathroom and would face onto No.24 Markyate Road. In the interests of the residential amenity of current and future occupiers, a condition has been appended to this decision to ensure that this window is fitted with obscured glazing. One of the three side dormers would serve a bedroom and would face onto No.24 Markyate Road. This neighbouring property is single storey and does not benefit from any first-floor windows. Therefore, it is not considered that the proposal would give rise to any harmful, mutual overlooking concerns. The proposed window is high level and therefore, it is considered that any potential views from this window would be limited and would not result in an unacceptable loss of privacy. One of the three side dormers would serve a bedroom and would face onto No.18 Markyate Road. No.18 is a two-storey detached property. This neighbour does benefit from a first floor window in the adjacent side elevation, however it is obscurely glazed. Moreover, the proposed dormer would be sited towards the rear of the northeastern side roofslope and would not be opposite window. Therefore, it is not considered that the proposal would give rise to any mutual overlooking concerns. The proposed window is high level and therefore, it is considered that any potential views from this window would be limited and would not result in an unacceptable loss of privacy. The proposed developments, due to their scale, design and siting (in terms of proximity to boundary and/or relationship with neighbouring properties), would not result in an unacceptable loss of light or overbearing impact to these neighbouring properties. The application site will maintain three bedrooms with one room labelled as a bedroom/playroom. The Parking Standards for New Developments Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) requires a 4 bedroom dwelling to have 3 parking spaces. This has been demonstrated on plan number 02_PL RevB. Slip End Parish Council and Natural England were consulted on this application but did not provide any comments. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. In conclusion, it is considered that the proposal will be in accordance with Section 12 of the NPPF, Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, the Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and the Central Bedfordshire Design Guide.
2 )Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.
3 )The site is located within the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC). Natural England have not provided any comments on this application, however, as no additional independent overnight accommodation is proposed, the proposal is not considered to have a detrimental impact upon the SAC.The site is located within the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC). Natural England have not provided any comments on this application, however, as no additional independent overnight accommodation is proposed, the proposal is not considered to have a detrimental impact upon the SAC.
4 )GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
5 )This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.
6 )Will a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.  The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.  If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.  Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bandsWill a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.  The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.  If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.  Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bands
Appeal Received Date:This case has no appeals against it
Planning Obligation Status:Not available

Return to Search PageTop of Page